Comments on Flutura's reflections:
http://fluturaveliu.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/refl-ection-1-date-07-08-12-asi-came.html?showComment=1344816622659#c5707789279319280900
http://fluturaveliu.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/date-14-8-12-todayi-asked-to-help-on.html?showComment=1345598250728#c310494154447346067
http://fluturaveliu.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/third-reflection-using-technology-to-be.html?showComment=1345955742604#c7322186515830815122
Comments on Kay's reflections:
http://kaylovestotalk.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/reflection-1-use-of-alaptop-today-one_8.html?showComment=1344730356147#c5435814098079631604
http://kaylovestotalk.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/reflection-2-technology-in-sandpit.html?showComment=1345182218956#c1460024953167193225
http://kaylovestotalk.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/reflection-3-using-camera.html?showComment=1345954726451#c230072858713788334
Comments on Marilyn's reflections:
http://mightymousemarilyn.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/using-microscope.html?showComment=1345611138207#c6403726018555344422
http://mightymousemarilyn.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/ipads-are-alwaysin-demand-we-usually.html?showComment=1345610617620#c409032820135768808
http://mightymousemarilyn.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/reflection-3-gluegun-scissors.html?showComment=1345955267245#c319012289300696504
Comments on Isabel's reflection:
http://fresh-and-fruity-isabel.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/the-staple-gun.html?showComment=1345181930306#c1404647963488105402
http://fresh-and-fruity-isabel.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/laptop-experience_7835.html?showComment=1345499531546#c7487063587552562335
http://fresh-and-fruity-isabel.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/to-see-or-not-to-see.html?showComment=1345956091466#c7816767468333200483
Thursday, 30 August 2012
Saturday, 25 August 2012
Complete reference list:
References:
Arthur, L., Beecher, B., Dockett, S., Farmer, S., &
Death, E. (2008). Programming and
planning in early childhood settings (4th ed). Melbourne,
Australia: Thompson Learning.
Dunkin,
D., & Hanna, P. (2001). Thinking
together: Quality adult child interaction. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand
Council for Education Research.
Edwards,
C. P. & K., Springate. (1995). Encouraging
Creativity in Early Childhood Classrooms. Eric Digest. # ED38947
Fleer,
Marilyn. (1997). The technical language children use at home’ in Early childhood Folio 3. NZCER.
Gonzalez-Mena,
J. (2008). Foundations of early childhood
education: Teaching children in a
diverse society (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill Higher
Education.
Google
images. (2012). Images of cameras.
Retrieved on 9th August 2012, from:
https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=images+of+cameras&hl=en&prmd=imvns&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=TRo4UPmZDPGviQeBt4C4CA&biw=1137&bih=683&sei=OBs4UKCFJOSiiAe9-YC4DA
Google
images. (2012). Traditional whiteboard
images with children. Retrieved on 22nd August 2012, from: https://www.google.com/search num=10&hl=en&site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1137&bih=683&q=traditional+whiteboard&oq=traditional+whiteboard&gs_l=img.12...1256.8926.0.12527.22.12.0.10.6.0.282.2537.0j4j8.12.0...0.0...1ac.AAqz3hja0Iw#hl=en&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=traditional+whiteboard+images+with+children&oq=traditional+whiteboard+images+with+children&gs_l=img.12...3690.9561.0.13919.21.21.0.0.0.0.265.4663.221.21.0...0.0...1c.kekNPktyKPE&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=d2cc27a743e79af3&biw=1137&bih=683
Manukau
Institute of Technology. School of Education. (2012, Semester Two). What is technology. Manukau, Auckland,
New Zealand: Author. Retrieved from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GS1xL1 qcBa4
Ministry of Education. (1996). Te
Whaariki: He whaariki matauranga mo nga mokopuna o Aotearoa: Early childhood
curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (2007).
The New Zealand curriculum for English-medium
teaching and learning in years
1-13. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media. Retrieved on 2nd July, 2012, from:
http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/
Murphy, K.,De Pasquale, R. & McNamara,
E. (2003). Meaningful connections, using technology in primary classrooms.
Beyond the journal, Young Children on the
Web, November 2003, 1-9. Retrieved 10th August 2012, from: http://www.naeyc.org/files/yc/file/200311/TechInPrimaryClassrooms.pdf
Santrock, J., W. (2010). Lifespan development: International student
edition (12th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Smorti, S. (1999) Technology in Early
Childhood. Early Education, 19, 5-10.
Tsantis, L., Bewick, C., & Thornton, S. (2003). Examining some
common myths about computers in the early years. Young Children on the Web, November 2003, 1-9.
Yang, S., H. (2009). Using blogs to
enhance critical reflection and community of practice. Educational Technology &
Society, 12 (2), 11-21.
Available online from http://www.ifets.info/journals/12_2/2.pdf
Thursday, 23 August 2012
Reflection: 3
22 August 2012
(Google image)
‘Communication
technology’
A whiteboard is a traditional form of technology and it is
an inexpensive way of teaching and learning. In my centre it is commonly used for the children to
explore, experiment, and be creative with colourful whiteboard markers. Today when I was outside with the
children I noticed a two year old toddler M was busy on the white board. She was making lines, circles and dots
and then joining them in shapes.
Two other toddlers came with chalk in their hands and started to draw on
the whiteboard. M followed them
and did the same but when the chalk did not work well she again got her
whiteboard marker and got busy in her drawing.
I came closer and asked, “can you tell me about your drawing
M.” She smiled and pointed towards
a round shape with a stick, “my flower, and a butterfly fluttering on the
flower.” I was amazed with her
description and acknowledged that those lines were making sense to me now. After observing M the other children
got the board markers too and started to draw while they were sharing their
ideas with each other. Ministry of
Education (1996) states, “growing experiences in solving problems together
develops children’s understanding of how technologies can help them and others”
(p. 96).
I learnt from the YouTube video about technology, provided
by our lecturer in one of the class power points, that the word technology was
first mentioned in 1829 but this term only became familiar in 1952 (Manukau
Institute of Technology, 2012). It
made me realize that technology was always there to help us but most of us were
not familiar with it. I think the
saying “out of sight out of mind” fits perfectly here. Whiteboards and markers have been in
use for teaching and learning for a long time and part of my childhood
schooling too. I remember we used
to be fascinated when teachers worked on whiteboards and students were not
allowed to use them. We often
tried out things when no one was there to see us. I am glad that early childhood centres are using whiteboards
frequently as they are saving a huge amount of paper from wastage. It’s a very innovative technological
tool that allows children to draw over and over and improve their drawing and
later writing skills.
In the example, the whiteboard and marker technology became
a learning and experimenting tool for the children. The children were developing their own working theories by
playing with ideas to work with chalk and then board markers. They were able to develop an
understanding that markers are working better on the board so they started to
use the markers rather than chalk on it.
According to
Ministry of Education (2007) technology provides, “an understanding of material
properties, uses, and development is essential to understanding how and why
products work the way they do (p. 32).
The whiteboard became a communication tool for M to draw and convey her
thoughts and ideas and it helped me to understand what she wanted to
express. The other two children
also learnt by doing and observing what is the best way to use a whiteboard. Smorti (1999) explains that one of the
differences between science and technology is the search for a practical
purpose as well as the study of how things might be.
My
early childhood course readings and my own and other blog fellows reflections
are helping me to understand the advantages and uses of technology in
depth. The more I am learning the
more I am appreciating technology and its benefits in our everyday life. I will keep up with my own learning
that in turn help me to enhance the children’s knowledge about technology too.
Thursday, 16 August 2012
Reflection 2
Reflection 2:
17th
August 2012
‘Learning Computer Technology’
A three year old girl F was busy on an activity table
creating something with ‘Interstar game.' In response to my question about
what she is making? She said, “I
am making my computer.” She used
her imagination and joined four different coloured parts to make a small
object, which can be closed just like a laptop. I asked, “how does your computer work? She said, “it doesn’t work because there
are no buttons. I don’t know how
to make them we don’t have computer in here.” I said, “Shall we look at my computer? F was very keen to see and said, “you
got buttons on your computer.” I
said, “yes my laptop has buttons and it is called a keyboard.
N joined us too and said, “it is not a laptop it is a
computer.” I said, “my computer’s
name is laptop because we can put it in our lap.” I let F and N explore how to put on the computer and to use
the keyboard to click on different icons.
Then I got the word page and asked them to press different keys to write
down different letters and their names.
They spent a long while pressing different keys and experiencing what
will happen on the screen. Later
on F was able to develop her version of keyboard with the pieces of Interstar
game.
I deliberately did this activity with the girls to let them
have the first hand experience of the computer. My centre does not have any computer for the children
because they are very young. While
I think it is important to make them familiar with its functions as it is
becoming part of educational learning too. Likewise, Murphy, DePasqual, and McNamara (2003) point out,
young children should have access to experience technology to develop knowledge
and skills for using it’s applications before they can use them independently
for prescribed purposes.
I started to use a computer when I joined my early childhood
course, I struggles and got frustrated spending many hours just to do minor
jobs. I personally favour the idea
of children getting familiar with computer technology because it is one of the
tools to be successful in further studies and job market. My idea is supported by Wheatley (2003,
as cited in Tsantis, Bewick, and Thouvenelle, 2003) that observation and
investigation found that there are long term effects on children’s elementary
grades due to lack of computer skills in preschool years.
The experience allowed F to feel, observe, and visualize the
laptop closely and then later on create her own keyboard. Computer technology was helping them to
explore what is the use of its keyboard and how it works. Smorti (1999) also support the view
that technology is about searching for solutions and solving problems. It also gave me the opportunity to build close relationship with
the girls and scaffold on their curiosity to learn. The girls learnt the names and functions of different parts
of the laptop. F compared her
model computer to the real computer while she was looking and then touching the
keyboard’s keys. Ministry of
Education (2007) recommends that children should develop “technological literacy that will
equip them to participate in society as informed citizens…” (p. 32).
I am convinced that there should be supervised opportunities
for young children to gain knowledge and become aware of the use of current
technology. In my opinion if there
is a well planned combination of indoor and outdoor activities then there is no
harm in letting children get familiar with computer technology.
Friday, 10 August 2012
Reflection
Reflection: 1
10th August 2012
“Camera
as a teaching tool”
I work with toddlers ages between 2 to 3 years. Like every other centre the use of a camera
is a very common practice in our centre.
Children usually watch teachers taking photos and imitate them by using
pretend cameras and are not allowed to touch them. During activity time while I was taking the photos B asked,
“Can I see my picture?” When I was showing her the pictures I said, “B can you
see me through the lens?” She was finding it hard to focus the lens and instead
was trying to see me through the screen of the camera. I explained to B that the lens of the
camera is just like your eye if you do not look at me you cannot see me. If you will focus the front lens towards
my face then only you can see me on your camera screen. This time she did so and said; “now I
can see you here.” Then I
explained how she could take my photo. B pressed the button and exclaimed with pleasure, “I did it
and I have your picture.” She took
several photos of her work and other children too and seemed very happy to do
so. Later on under my supervision
I let her teach other children how to use the camera and take a real picture.
Although we use camera ever day, I myself never
consciously acknowledged that it is part of technology. After my ‘people, places, things and
events’ class I reflected on the matter and realized that cameras and pictures
are every day part of our life. I
thought it would be a good opportunity to take a further step and use ‘teachable
moment’ (Gonzalez-Mena, 2008) to build on children’s interest. Child developmental
theories made me aware that positive learning experiences enhance self-esteem,
which leads to empowerment (Santrock, 2010).
It was a positive learning experience for all of us
as, including myself, we learnt something new. While children were using the camera they were having a real
life experience. They were learning
the function of the camera and learnt to get the desired picture they by focusing
the lens and then pressing the button.
It was a different experience then the use of artificial cameras where
they cannot get the idea of how it really works. Ministry of Education (1996) states,
“[children develop] the ability to represent their discoveries, using creative
and expressive media and the technology associated with them” (p. 88).
This activity promoted their cognitive development
because it involved the thinking process too. Fisher and Garvey (1992, as cited in Smorti, 1999) point out
that unlike science, technology is based on a thinking process. The activity also provided the children with
an opportunity to interact with each other and scaffold each other’s learning. During our conversation they learnt some
new technical vocabulary such as what is a lens, screen of a camera and
flashlight. According to
Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory children learn best in their social
settings. Vygotsky (1986-1934, as
cited in Gonzalez-Mena, 2008) believed in, “the power of language and in social
interaction as a vital ingredient in learning and development” (p. 27).
I reflected on the
activity and came to the conclusion that it is important for teachers to let go
of our own fear and assumptions about children’s abilities. Part of not letting children touch the
camera is our fear that they might break it or they have no sense yet how to
use it. I also learnt that I have
to overcome my own worry of knowing very little about technology. The experience made me realize how
easily and simply by using an everyday object I can teach children about
technology.
As I am becoming
aware of the importance of technology I will consciously try to make it part of
the children’s learning.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

